|
|
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
is a revolutionary Act! -George Orwell
For
Truth
Org. |
Donate$12.00 or more to FTO
|
|
|
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
is a revolutionary Act! -George Orwell
For
Truth
Org. |
Donate$12.00 or more to FTO
|
| If you wish to receive article /updates | by email then please let us know |
 |
Have a product or service you want to advertise? Advertise it HERE for Free |
|
US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DEBT is $9 TRILLION
That's $30,000 per PERSON (that's YOU).
Ever wondered who YOU owe it to? Most of is interest (that doesn't exist) on a debt to the Federal Reserve Bank CLICK HERE and find out how YOU can change things. |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from donations, and purchases, are used to maintain this site and to help distribute the truth. |
|
|||
|
Resource Links
Freedom Force International
12 Pages all Americans should read and
disseminate.
A
Political Party For Real Change (BC)
Movies About Taxation
Download this BANNED book
|
October 24, 2007
|
| If “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to Petition the government for Redress of Grievances” (First Amendment), and if “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain Rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the People” (Ninth Amendment) and if, “The Right of the People to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated,”(Fourth Amendment) and if, “No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property without Due Process of law….” (Fifth Amendment), and if the Constitution must be construed in its entirety, and if the Government has committed acts that have violated that Constitution, do Plaintiffs acting in their individual private capacities have a Right to an official response from Government to their Petitions for Redress of constitutional torts, and if Government refuses to respond to those Petitions, are the People not then free to retain their money until their Grievances are Redressed and, if the People do withdraw their financial support from the Government for that reason, is the Government not then prohibited from retaliating against those People by enforcing the internal revenue laws against those People via summonses, liens, levies and seizures, and prosecutions, and otherwise seeking to prevent those People from freely Speaking out and Associating with other People for the purposes of furthering public debate, altering the way the Government operates, and exposing and correcting those un-Constitutional acts? |
In December, if all goes according to schedule, the Supreme Court will announce if it has decided to hear the case.
United States v. We
The People
is the lawsuit filed in April 2007 by the Government against Bob Schulz
and the We The People organization in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of New York. This civil injunction action seeks to
prevent Schulz and the We The People organization from freely distributing
the so-called, “Blue Folder.”
The folder contains information relating to the
legality of the institutionalized practice of the Government in forcing
entities to withhold pay from workers and to divert that pay to the
Government. The Blue Folder was first served on the Government by Schulz
as a Petition for Redress of the Grievance, with a Notice that unless the
Government responded by denying any of the statements contained within the
Folder, WTP would freely distribute it to workers and company officials.
The Government did not respond, notwithstanding its
duty to do so.
In the Spring of 2003, considering the Government’s silence to be
admission, the Foundation distributed thousands of copies of the Folder
for free at dozens of meetings across America, and the information was
posted on the website for free download.
Four years later the Government brought the action in spite of the
numerous, explicit protections afforded by the Speech, Press, Assembly and
Petition Clauses of the First Amendment and despite the fact that no
reasonable person could properly characterize the political Speech
contained within the Blue Folder as a commercial, "abusive tax shelter."
With these two lawsuits, the federal Judicial
department is now poised, for the first time in history, to
recognize and declare the original intent and purpose of the power of the
People embodied in the political clauses of the First Amendment,
specifically the protections afforded to the People when claiming,
exercising and enforcing the Right to Petition: “Congress shall make no
law…abridging the freedom of Speech, or of the Press, or of the Right of
the People to peaceably Assemble and to Petition the Government for
Redress of Grievances”.
People who have been following the continuing struggles for Liberty have a keen appreciation of the patient’s current health. The sad truth is, should the Judiciary fail to administer the Founding Principles and Grand Rights to a resolution of the questions presented to the Courts in these two lawsuits our Republic will surely succumb to the twin cancers of tyranny and despotism.
With regard to our First Amendment, first impression, questions now before the Courts, there really is, and can be, no "middle ground" under our system of self-government and Popular Sovereignty. Either the People are Free or they are not. Either the Government is a servant government, beholden to the People and constrained in its authority to act by the written word of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, or it is the Master of our house -- the United States of America.
Let us pray that the federal Judiciary, although potentially biased and prejudiced because of its inherent conflict of interest, will rise above the temptations of politicization and fear of Ordered Liberty, to stand soundly for the protection and preservation of the unalienable Rights of Men, as endowed by their Creator.
So much is at stake. We hope you will invest the personal time to study the two legal memorandums and urge others to read them as well. We stand upon a great moment of history. The People need to know and understand the gravity of the issues now pending before the Judiciary.
Any and all comments and suggestions are welcomed,
Click Here.
Read the
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court
(We
The People v U.S.) and the
Appendix
Read the
Appeal to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals:
(U.S.
v We The People)
Why won't they answer
the question?
What law requires us to pay taxes? The
question is simple enough, and has been asked by so many even in the
courts. The answer has yet to be provided. If enough people ask then the
truth will be known.
If you don't see the video you should get the more secure Firefox browser, or click HERE to view
Landmark income tax related win in federal court. Goes unreported by the mainstream media
Sep. 20, 2007
Source: Las Vegas Review Journal
Four-month trial ends with no
convictions
Federal income
tax evasion case involved nine defendants
Monday's verdict "sends a strong message," said defense attorney Lisa Rasmussen, who represented Joel Axberg, a tile layer.
Informally called the Kahre case -- after the primary defendant, local business owner Robert Kahre, who paid workers in gold and silver coins -- the trial lasted four months. It relied heavily on evidence gathered in a controversial armed raid in May 2003 on several of Kahre's local business places. The raid entailed keeping more than 20 workers handcuffed, at gunpoint, in 106-degree heat without shade or water while agents collected records and equipment.
"Yeah, that's a pretty major victory," said defense lawyer William Cohan. "If you go 0 for 160 (in baseball), they'd send you down to the minor leagues."
The jury also hung on all counts faced by Kahre's sister, Lori Kahre, and defendant Alex Loglia.
Four defendants acquitted of all the charges against them were Axberg, Robert Furman, Ron Ruggles, and Kahre's mother, Myra Buonomo.
"It was the most wonderful feeling and the most wonderful day in ages," Buonomo, 66, said of her acquittal. She said she works "more or less as a runner" for her son's construction-related businesses. Part of the case hinged on whether Kahre's workers were employees or independent contractors, who are responsible for paying their own taxes.
Two other defendants, Dannielle Alires and Debra Rosenbaum, were partly acquitted, with the jury hung on one count each.
Before trial, five additional defendants had pleaded guilty.
Michael Kennedy, who defended Lori Kahre, said the case turned on the notion that taxpayers could be wrong without being criminal. He was referring to the fact that his client, Lori Kahre, and other defendants had not paid taxes according to the market value of the precious metal content of the coins in which they were paid, as opposed to their face value. He conceded at trial that his client may owe federal taxes for her mistakes.
The Internal Revenue Service had never before provided guidance on how to handle gold and silver coins that circulate, only on noncirculating collectible coins, according to Kennedy, who is a federal public defender. "If that's the case, we're not going to take someone's liberty from them, on something that a (certified public accountant) with a master's degree doesn't even know. That's a scary country, and I don't live in that country."
J. Gregory Damm, the assistant U.S. attorney who led the prosecution, declined to say whether the government will retry any of the five defendants on the charges that resulted in a hung jury. Damm referred the newspaper to Natalie Collins, public affairs specialist for the U.S. attorney's office in Las Vegas.
Acting U.S. Attorney Steven W. Myhre issued a statement through Collins that thanked jurors, investigators and prosecutors. "Ultimately, the responsibility lies with the jury to decide whether the government met its burden of proof in the case and we accept their decision." He said the office will "soon decide" whether to retry any defendants.
Jurors got stuck on the question of whether the government had proved defendants intentionally violated tax law, according to David Ramirez, jury foreman. "Oh my God, the willfulness is very hard to prove, as we found out," Ramirez, 49, said Wednesday. "That was the hard part, especially in the conspiracy charge." Ramirez works in management for the U.S. Postal Service.
The government "did not present one witness who agreed with the conspiracy theory," said attorney Joel Hansen, who defended Loglia. Currently unemployed, Loglia did paralegal work for Kahre.
The jurors favoring acquittal varied by defendant, Ramirez said. "Personally, I went guilty (on some counts) and some, not guilty." He said when the 12 jurors split on a count, it was usually a 6-6 or 7-5 split.
Ramirez said the prosecuting team had a clear, although silent, reaction to the verdict: "The head was hanging down, the shoulders were low." He said "shocked" was the term some prosecutors used to describe themselves when they talked to him after the trial.
Cohan did not want Robert Kahre, who testified during the trial, to talk to reporters after the trial because his client and five others still face additional charges in a separate criminal tax case set for trial in January. That case alleges Kahre hid assets by having relatives or friends buy property in their names using his funds.
Once the criminal cases are over, Kahre will pursue related civil actions he has filed against several parties, including federal prosecutor Damm, Internal Revenue Service agents and North Las Vegas police officers who had roles in the raid or indictment process.
Alex Jones interviewing ex-I.R.S. agent Joe
Bannister
If you don't see the video you should get the more secure
Firefox
browser, or click
HERE
to view
People who have won against the I.R.S.
Tommy Cryer (lawyer)
Joe Bannister Ex- I.R.S.
Quote:
“The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.”
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. It wasn't the world being round that agitated people, but that the world wasn't flat.When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic"
(Dresden James, Author)
Witness assulted by I.R.S agent (audio)
$300,000.00 reward
Protect your assets.
Buy Salt Spring Island
.999
Fine Silver BU Coins from our shop.
The contents of this website are protected by copyright all rights are reserved
| The contents of this website shall not be construed as providing legal, or financial advice. Information is provided from many sources, and it is recommended that the visitors to this website verify all claims and statements made herein or on web sites that this web site links to. Always research, and verify to confirm validity of claims, in your own interest. The owners of this website will not be held liable for any damages to person or property that may result directly or indirectly as a result of using or viewing this website or any website that is linked to from this website. |
